McAdam, Doug, The Biographical Consequences of Activism (1989)
Research Question: What happens to individuals who experience dangerous forms of activism?
Popular conception is that activists of the 1960’s “sold-out” and became yuppies.
Implication is that the activism of the 60’s was a developmental phase that the participants grew out of- they sewed their wild oats.
However, there are not too many public examples of the hard-core activist turn mainstream citizen.
Only 2-4% of baby-boomers actually took an active role in activism in the 1960’s
Inconsistent with accounts from former activists and studies
Conversion vs. Alternation
Conversion is the process of radical transformation in the lifestyle/ worldview of a person
Alternation is the developmental changes in personality/ lifestyle.
Degree of importance of activism the degree of conversion or alternation
Methodological problems with former studies of activism
Longitudinal studies insufficiently help understand the impact of activism vs period effects
Has sufficient time lapsed between iterations to identify enduring changes to attitude
Studies draw from narrow geographical region
Lack of before and after data on activists
Design:
330 participants- all applicants to the 1964 Freedom Summer Project
Two groups- Participants (212) and No-shows (118)
Attitude of individuals prior to Freedom Summer assessed using applications- participants and no-shows similar for many different variables.
Questioners sent out to determine change in attitudes with the treatment being the Freedom Summer experience.
Results:
Both groups showed high levels of political involvement prior to freedom summer
Results broken into short and long term categories
Short Term (political):
Freedom summer volunteers far more politically active than no-shows
Gap in activity between participants and no-shows increases after freedom summer
Individuals who maintain contact with other Freedom Summer volunteers have the highest levels of political activism
Long Term (political):
Participants remain more politically active than no-shows
Freedom Summer experience created conversion effect in individuals politically
Participation a predictor of long term political organizational affiliation, which is also related to current activism
Short term (personal):
Later full-time employment for participants
Choice of career and marital partners affected by activism more by participants
Married at the same rate between groups
Participants enrolled less in school during the 1960’s
Long term (personal):
Higher incomes by the no-shows- influenced by earlier entry into workforce
Lower income of participants influenced by seeking work in activism
Higher rates of divorce among participants
Conclusion
Freedom Summer had a long term impact on participants
Experienced conversion effect as opposed to alternation by no-shows
Lifelong effect as opposed to merely a short-term effect
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment